AEGISAI

AI model inventory template

Free AI Model Inventory Template for Banks and Credit Unions

Use this AI model inventory template to track every AI model, vendor model, embedded model, and material AI-enabled tool across your institution.

The template structure is built for SR 11-7 model inventory discipline and current SR 26-2 AI governance expectations: ownership, risk tiering, validation status, monitoring evidence, vendor dependencies, and board-ready reporting.

Free resource

Download the free AI model inventory starter checklist

Get a quick model inventory starter checklist with the fields compliance, model risk, and audit teams need before SR 11-7 or SR 26-2 review.

No spam. Use this as a practical planning aid, not legal or regulatory advice.

Why model inventory is the first AI governance file

Banks and credit unions cannot govern AI systems they cannot see. A model inventory is the operating file that tells compliance, model risk, vendor management, IT, audit, and leadership which AI models exist, where they are used, who owns them, and what evidence supports their approval.

For community banks, the inventory should cover more than internally developed statistical models. It should include vendor-provided AI, embedded machine learning features, fraud and AML scoring tools, credit decision support, customer communication tools, analytics models, and material employee-use AI systems.

The practical goal is simple: if an examiner, auditor, or board committee asks which AI models are in use, the institution can produce a current, risk-tiered list with owners, status, and evidence links.

SR 11-7 and SR 26-2 inventory fields

SR 11-7 model risk management work made model inventory a core governance discipline. Current SR 26-2 and OCC Bulletin 2026-13 language makes that discipline more urgent for AI systems because AI exposure can sit inside vendor platforms, change through updates, or affect customers without being labeled as a traditional model.

A useful inventory should connect legacy model risk fields to current AI governance fields. That means retaining model owner, validation, monitoring, and use-case fields while adding vendor ownership, customer impact, AI system category, data sensitivity, change cadence, explainability limits, and remediation status.

  • Model name, system ID, owner, and business purpose
  • Internal, vendor-provided, embedded, or employee-use classification
  • Risk tier, customer-impact flag, and materiality rating
  • Validation status, monitoring cadence, and issue history
  • Data inputs, sensitive data exposure, and output use
  • SR 11-7 continuity and SR 26-2 evidence mapping

How to use the template

Start with a cross-functional sweep. Ask business lines, analytics, IT, information security, compliance, vendor management, operations, and internal audit to identify systems that score, classify, predict, recommend, generate, summarize, monitor, or automate decisions.

Next, risk-tier every entry. Customer-impacting, credit, fraud, AML, compliance monitoring, cybersecurity, regulatory reporting, and critical operations models should receive deeper review than low-risk internal productivity tools.

Finally, turn missing fields into remediation work. A blank validation date, unclear owner, missing vendor evidence, or undefined monitoring metric should become a tracked gap with an owner, due date, and governance reporting path.

AI model inventory template fields

These are the core columns a bank or credit union should capture before deciding validation depth, monitoring cadence, vendor follow-up, or board reporting status.

  1. 1Model or AI system name
  2. 2Business purpose and approved use
  3. 3Business owner and model risk owner
  4. 4Vendor, developer, or platform provider
  5. 5Internal, vendor, embedded, or employee-use type
  6. 6Risk tier and materiality rating
  7. 7Customer-impact and consumer-compliance flag
  8. 8Data inputs and sensitive data exposure
  9. 9Output type and downstream decision use
  10. 10Validation status and last review date
  11. 11Monitoring metrics, thresholds, and cadence
  12. 12Known limitations and prohibited uses
  13. 13Change history and vendor release notes
  14. 14Open issues, remediation owner, and due date
  15. 15Evidence links for audit, board, or examiner review

Download the AI model inventory template

The Starter Kit includes model governance and evidence tracking materials that help teams document AI inventory, validation status, vendor evidence, monitoring cadence, and remediation ownership in one reviewable file.

FAQ

What should an AI model inventory include?

An AI model inventory should include the model name, business purpose, owner, vendor or developer, risk tier, customer-impact flag, data inputs, outputs, intended use, validation status, monitoring cadence, change history, open issues, and retirement status.

Does SR 11-7 require a model inventory?

SR 11-7 expects banking organizations to maintain a comprehensive model inventory as part of model risk management. For AI systems, the inventory should also capture vendor ownership, AI-specific limitations, monitoring evidence, and current SR 26-2 mapping where applicable.

How does SR 26-2 affect AI model inventory work?

SR 26-2 and related 2026 model risk language increase the need to make AI-enabled, vendor-provided, and rapidly changing models visible. Teams should document ownership, intended use, validation evidence, monitoring, third-party dependencies, and board or committee reporting status.

Can a spreadsheet model inventory prove compliance?

No. A spreadsheet can organize evidence and support governance review, but it does not determine legal, regulatory, audit, supervisory, privacy, security, or model validation compliance. Institutions should adapt the template to their facts and review it with qualified advisors.

Make AI model exposure visible before the next review.

A complete inventory gives risk, compliance, audit, and leadership a shared view of which AI systems exist, how they are governed, and where evidence gaps remain.

Related AI governance resources

Important limitation

This resource is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, regulatory, audit, supervisory, model validation, privacy, security, or compliance advice. Institutions should consult qualified counsel and risk, compliance, audit, privacy, security, and model risk professionals regarding their specific obligations.

  • Inventory internal and vendor-provided AI models.
  • Risk-tier each model by materiality and customer impact.
  • Track validation and monitoring evidence.
  • Map legacy SR 11-7 fields to current SR 26-2 expectations.